← ホームに戻る
Picute vs Notta 比較
AI meeting notes & transcription
Picute turns speech into burned-in video subtitles — Notta is built for meeting notes
| 機能 | Picute | Notta |
|---|---|---|
| 最大動画長 | Unlimited | 5hr (Pro) |
| 字幕焼き付け | One-click | No (notes tool) |
| 対応言語 | 70+ | 58 |
| キャプションプリセット | 20+ animated | None |
| 価格 | $15/mo | $8.17/mo (annual) |
| 精度 | High | ~95% |
Picuteを選ぶ場合
- ✓Built for video: one-click subtitle burn-in and 20+ animated caption presets
- ✓Exports ready-to-use SRT subtitle files for video editing
- ✓Longer free-tier files than Notta's 3-minute-per-file cap
- ✓Translates captions into another language for global video audiences
Nottaを選ぶ場合
- ✓Purpose-built for live meetings — real-time notes and AI summaries
- ✓58-language transcription with real-time bilingual options
- ✓Generous free tier (120 minutes/month)
- ✓Lower entry price ($8.17/mo annual vs $15/mo)
Picuteが最適な場合
you need multilingual video subtitles with burn-in, not meeting notes
Picuteが最適でない場合
you mainly want real-time meeting notes and AI summaries
機能比較データはJune 2026に最終確認されました。価格や機能が変更されている場合があります。 出典